Skip to main content
도움말

현재 버전 게시자: Dan ,

본문:

@avanteguarde - LateTake a look at this graph:
@avanteguarde - LateTake a look at this graph:
 
[image|1053834]
 
Here you can see how things have improved with Seagate. Don't forget they are using more Seagate per a given drive model than the others which can mislead you if you just look at the failure numbers. Look at the total run hours. Yes, HGST is still doing better and yes WD owns them, which does throw the numbers if you add them together. I still treat them as a different company as they use a different drive design than the WD drives.

현황:

open

편집 작업: Dan ,

본문:

@avanteguarde - Late a look at this graph:
 
[image|1053834]
 
Here you can see how things have improved with Seagate. Don't forget they are using more Seagate per a given drive model than the others which can mislead you if you just look at the failure numbers. Look at the total run hours. Yes, HGST is still doing better and yes WD owns them, which does throw the numbers if you add them intogether. I still treat them as a different company as they use a different drive design than the WD drives.
Here you can see how things have improved with Seagate. Don't forget they are using more Seagate per a given drive model than the others which can mislead you if you just look at the failure numbers. Look at the total run hours. Yes, HGST is still doing better and yes WD owns them, which does throw the numbers if you add them intogether. I still treat them as a different company as they use a different drive design than the WD drives.

현황:

open

편집 작업: Dan ,

본문:

@avanteguarde - Late a look at this graph:
 
[image|1053834]
 
Here you can see how things have improved with Seagate. Don't forget they are using more Seagate per a given drive model than they do with WDthe others which can mislead you if you just look at the failure numbers. Look at the total run hours. Yes, HGST is still doing better and yes WD owns which does throw the numbers if you add them in. I still treat them as a different company as they use a different drive design than the WD drives.
Here you can see how things have improved with Seagate. Don't forget they are using more Seagate per a given drive model than they do with WDthe others which can mislead you if you just look at the failure numbers. Look at the total run hours. Yes, HGST is still doing better and yes WD owns which does throw the numbers if you add them in. I still treat them as a different company as they use a different drive design than the WD drives.

현황:

open

편집 작업: Dan ,

본문:

@avanteguarde - Late a look at this graph:
 
[image|1053834]
 
Here you can see how things have improved with Seagate. Don't forget they are using more Seagate per a given drive model than they do with WD/HGSTWD which can mislead you if you just look at the failure numbers. Look at the total run hours. Yes, HGST is still doing better and yes WD owns which does throw the numbers if you add them in. I still treat them as a different company as they use a different drive design than the WD drives.
Here you can see how things have improved with Seagate. Don't forget they are using more Seagate per a given drive model than they do with WD/HGSTWD which can mislead you if you just look at the failure numbers. Look at the total run hours. Yes, HGST is still doing better and yes WD owns which does throw the numbers if you add them in. I still treat them as a different company as they use a different drive design than the WD drives.

현황:

open

편집 작업: Dan ,

본문:

@avanteguarde - Late a look at this graph:
 
[image|1053834]
 
Here you can see how things have improved with Seagate. Don't forget they are using more seagateSeagate per a given drive model than they do with WD/HGST which can mislead you if you just look at the failure numbers. Look at the total run hours.
Here you can see how things have improved with Seagate. Don't forget they are using more seagateSeagate per a given drive model than they do with WD/HGST which can mislead you if you just look at the failure numbers. Look at the total run hours.

현황:

open

원문 게시자: Dan ,

본문:

@avanteguarde - Late a look at this graph:

[image|1053834]

Here you can see how things have improved with Seagate. Don't forget they are using more seagate per a given drive model than they do with WD/HGST which can mislead you if you just look at the failure numbers. Look at the total run hours.

현황:

open