메인 콘텐츠로 스킵하기

모델 A1419 / EMC 2806 / Late 2014 또는 Mid 2015. 3.3 또는 3.5 GHz Core i5 또는 4.0 GHz Core i7 (ID iMac15,1); EMC 2834 late 2015 / 3.3 또는 3.5 GHz Core i5 또는 4.0 GHz Core i7 (iMac17,1) 모두 Retina 5K 화면 장착

257 질문 전체 보기

Why is the 2TB FD via PCI-Express and 1TB FD NVM-Express?

I saw that the 1 TB Fusion Drive SSD is connected via NVM Express and the 2 TB Fusion Drive Connects via PCI Express.

Isn't the NVM Express the faster connection?

답변되었습니다! View the answer 저도 같은 문제를 겪고 있습니다

좋은 질문 입니까?

점수 0
의견 추가하세요

맥북 배터리 수리 키트

기본 가격은 $69.99

Buy Now

맥북 배터리 수리 키트

기본 가격은 $69.99

Buy Now

1개의 답변

선택된 해법

This can be a bit confusing!

First lets review what a Fusion Drive is: The word 'fuse' give us a clue here, we are linking (fusing) two discrete drives within the OS so they are seen as one.

In this case a SATA III (6.0 Gb/s) traditional spinning hard drive and either a PCIe 2.0 x 4 lane NVM-Express blade SSD (in the current model) or in the previous model a PCIe 2 lane blade SSD.

iMac 27" 3.3 GHz i5 (5K, Mid-2015)

iMac 27" 3.2 GHz i5 (5K, Late-2015)

For a comparison here is a benchmark between them:

  • 2014/Mid 2015 iMac 5K: writes at ~716 MB/sec and reads at ~766 MB/sec.
  • Late 2015 iMac 5K: writes at ~1520 MB/sec and reads at ~2080 MB/sec.

While the benchmark shows the faster 4 lane PCIe NVM interfaced SSD is faster than the older 2 lane PCIe. The width of the connection has a lot to do with it (2 vs 4 lanes).

To be clear here you can't use the newer SSD in the older system the system does not offer a 4 lane PCIe interface.

해당 답변은 도움이 되었습니까?

점수 1
의견 추가하세요

귀하의 답변을 추가하십시오

Flo 가/이 대단히 고마워 할 것입니다.
조회 통계:

지난 24시간: 0

지난 7일: 0

지난 30일: 0

전체 시간: 167