소개
MacBook Pro 라인이 더 간단해졌습니다. 아닌가? 13” 모델은 여전히 두 가지로 제공하지만 그들을 구별하기는 어렵습니다—포트 개수가 유일한 단서입니다. Apple은 일반 모델을 유지하며 Touch Bar 공간을 마련했을까요 아니면 이 새 모델은 기존 (비싼) Touch Bar 디자인의 골자만 남긴 버전일까요? 아니면 완전히 새로운 것일까요? 모든 부품을 풀고 어떤 것이 빠져나오는지 살펴보겠습니다.
분해를 더 원하세요? 자사의 Facebook, Instagram 및 Twitter를 팔로우하여 모든 최신 분해 뉴스를 접하세요. 뉴스를 받으려면, 자사의 뉴스레터를 신청하세요.
필요한 것
동영상 개요
-
-
너무 멀리 가기 전에 이 모델이 라인업에 어떤 영향을 주는지 살펴봅시다:
-
2560x1600 해상도 (227dpi), P3 고색 재현 13.3” LED-백라이트 IPS "Retina" 디스플레이
-
통합 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 지원 1.4GHz quad-core Intel Core i5 (Turbo Boost 최대 3.9GHz)
-
8GB 2133MHz LPDDR3 온보드 메모리
-
128GB, 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 또는 2TB PCIe-기반 SSD
-
충전 지원 Thunderbolt 3 (USB-C) 포트 두 개, DisplayPort, Thunderbolt, USB 3.1 Gen 2
-
Apple T2 맞춤형 보조프로세서
-
-
-
혼자 덩그러니 있어도 우리는 헤드폰 잭이 돌아와서 기쁩니다. ("Pro" 기기의 포트 두 개와 헤드폰 잭은 여전히 인색한 느낌이 듭니다. 그렇죠?)
-
이제 여는 절차는 유행에 뒤쳐집니다. 몇 개의 Pentalobe/펜타 로브/별나사와 클립 몇 개를 보내면 MacBook Pro를 들여다볼 수 있습니다 … 놀랍도록 이전 기능 키 모델과 비슷합니다.
-
새로운 58.2Wh 배터리 용량은 이전 기능 키 모델의 54.5Wh 배터리를 약간 능가합니다. 아마 Touch Bar, Touch ID 센서 및 T2 칩을 추가하고도 10-시간 배터리 수명을 동일하게 유지하는 방법인가 봅니다.
-
더 많은 코어와 TDP로 작동하는—더 비싼 13” 모델의 58.0Wh 배터리보다 더 좋습니다.
¿ Hay algún problema si se reemplaza la batería original de 58.wh con una de 54.5wh ? ¿ o no hay problema ?
-
-
-
Touch Bar와 Touch ID 센서의 공간을 확보하기 위해 Apple은 배기관 왼편 히트 파이프를 조금 잘라낸 것 같습니다. 2016 "Function keys" 버전과 (상단 이미지) 올해의 모델을 (하단 이미지) 비교합니다.
-
걱정해야 할까요? 이 초박형 "Pro" 노트북의 냉각은 이미 소홀하게 보였습니다. 올해 프로세서 15W TDP는 2016년 보다 낮지 않습니다.
-
자사의 Manta 드라이버 키트의 도움으로—배터리 커넥터에서 팬케이크 나사를 빙글빙글 돌려 전원을 차단합니다.
-
2016년 모델 모듈식 SSD가 지내던 곳의 스티커를 떼니— 납땜한 쉴드를 발견합니다. 놀랍지는 않지만 여전히 실망스럽습니다—MacBook Pro 라인에서 마지막으로 업그레이드할 수 있는 부품중 한 개가 완전히 사라졌습니다.
Any soldering can be desoldered…but that’s easier said than done.
-
-
-
-
팬 반대편의 스피커도 2016년 이전 모델에 비해 쇠약해 보입니다.
-
Apple의 오디오 엔지니어는 정말 마법사입니다 하지만 우리는 아무리 마법사라도 이렇게 작아진 스피커로 동일한 음질을 유지할 수 있다는데는 회의적입니다.
-
Torx 나사 몇 개 만 이 스피커를 고정합니다—다른 여러 모델과 달리 접착되지 않았습니다. 교체는, 거의, 이보다 더 쉬울수 없습니다.
-
이 화제의 모듈식 Thunderbolt 보드는 멋진 업그레이드입니다—지난번에는 로직 보드에 납땜되었습니다. 이 새로운 구성은 나머지 최신 Pro 라인과 더 비슷합니다.
-
조금 더 나아가 우리는 또 다른 모듈식 걸작의 대접을 받습니다: 헤드폰 잭 모듈. 헤드폰 잭, 마이크 및 Touch ID 커넥터를 포함하며 값 비싼 로직 보드를 끌어들이지 않고도 쉽게 교체할 수 있습니다.
The predecessor was the mid-2017 Function Keys MacBook Pro 13”, not the late-2016 model.
Apparently that headphone jack module has a Hall-effect sensor that is extremely fragile and will be ruined if you touch it. Oh, and the whole assembly is so fragile you’re suppose to replace it every time it gets removed.
a este modelo se le puede cambiar el ssd? o esta fijo y soldado?
Seal Garza - 답글
Fixed and soldered.
Fijo y soldado.
-
-
-
로직 보드를 들어올려 무엇을 숨기고 있는지 살펴 봅니다:
-
Intel SREZ2 Core i5-8257U 프로세서
-
Apple APL1027 339S00604 T2 보조프로세서
-
2x Samsung K4E6E304EC-EGCG 2GB LPDDR3 RAM (이쪽면에 총 4GB)
-
Toshiba TSB 42260 F1473 TWNA1 1914 64GB 플래시 스토리지
-
Intel JHL7540 Thunderbolt 3 컨트롤러
-
338S00267-A0 (아마도 Apple PMIC)
You’re right! We’ve made the change. Thank you!
-
-
-
그리고 우리는 로직 보드 아래에 숨겨있는 것들을 더 발견합니다:
-
NXP 80V18 보안 NFC 모듈
-
Texas Instruments CD3217B12 및 TPS51980B (아마도 전원 컨트롤러)
-
2x Samsung K4E6E304EC-EGCG 2GB LPDDR3 RAM (이쪽면에 4GB, 총 8GB)
-
Toshiba TSB 42260 F1473 TWNA1 1914 64GB 플래시 스토리지 (총 128GB)
-
Cirrus Logic CS42L83A 오디오 코덱
-
Intersil 95828A HRTZ X915HKB 및 9240H1 8905FD
-
Murata 1SA 339S00616 SS9521026 Bluetooth/Wi-Fi 모듈
What is the silkscreen marking on the 2 devices (speaker drivers) at the top right corner of the PCB?
-
다음 번역가들에게 특별히 감사 드립니다:
91%
Christian Kim님은 저희가 세상을 수리하는데 동참하신 분입니다! 기여하시겠습니까?
번역 시작하기 ›
댓글 39개
I love how professional these breakdowns have become over the years!
SSD chips do go bad over time; most vendors recommend total replacement after 240 gigabytes of overwrites per gigabyte of chip. Soldering down the SSD flash chips means these machines need Ball Grid Array rework when reconditioned for resale after lease return. Apple will be doing that rework, so we can maybe assume the ticklish microsurgery doesn't phase them?
Why solder them down in the first place? Because of the T2 chip. T2 is very…possessive of SSD memory.
But apple is not gonna do the repair beyond the warranty, so I don't believe it's a consolation that apple would do that repair when I buy computers to last me a decade. You seem even a bit optimistic about this.
QuincyMB -
I’m very curious about SSD failures over time. Are there are any stats out there? I’m talking about the high quality NAND used in the likes of Apple SSDs and not USB/SD-card failures.
biscuit -
Ya no. Nearly every consumer grade SSD comes with a 5 year warranty (or ~150 TBW per 250 GB). An SSD will last for decades without issue or loss of space. Modern SSDs eclipse traditional HDDs and even those these days can last a good chunk of time (my NAS is purring and it’s HDDs are about 6 years old).
When you say “most vendors” I’m sure you meant to say no one. People have long been crunching theoretical usage patterns in most general consumer usage against SSDs and have figured they’ll last something like 15 years, give or take. Obviously it depends on your usage pattern, but if you wrote 20 GB per day, every day for the life of drive, you’ll hit the manufacturers estimates in ~ 20 years (150 TBW per 250 GB). And that’s the bottom end. So at the bare minimum, with even aggressive usage (45GB a day), you’re likely going to see 10 years, easy. That’s if the drive dies right at 150 TBW/250GB, which is pretty %#*@ unlikely.
Tiem -
@Tiem, you must work for APple as you’re trying to stand proud on false data. That’s Apple marketing style 100%. So..let’s clear the air before your willful misuse of data spreads as ignorance. • 60 to 150 TBW , which takes your 20 yr span and cut is down to about 7. • ..So a SPAN of 7-20 years. • ..I won’t go on about the rest of your abuse of information relay with puffed chest ego writing. • ..SSDs can fail -> making a $40-$100 fix into a $1000 apple repair. (sarcasm with a smile in good fun: … Or am I wrong and it’s a possible death trip to !&&* where Apple swoops in and saves you for $1000 ?) USE FULL & REAL DATA! — Enjoy your week everyone!
Ram, processor bump isn’t that significant. More ram will help it feel snappier after you have more background tasks going.
Both, you can’t decide later on. But if you really are pushed for one, do the RAM, or better still the SSD size.
Totally RAM for sure.
pop -
RAM obviously. Processor is limited by cooling - upgrade to the other 13’ with double cooling fans if you need more CPU performance.
Good overview. A throwaway device should be at throwaway prices. Apple could give these things away if the customer would sign a long term rental agreement for iCloud Drive, Apple Music, and other Apple rental units. I do like the repairability and upgradeability of my 2012 MBP though.
How about a complete keyboard replacement due to a liquid damage?
How easy it is to replace it.
People say that the Mac Book Pro is quiet and not hot.
I don’t wonder why. I wonder why do they buy it.
Doing stuff that need less than 7W TDP call for a 7W TDP Atom (or, slightly better, Celeron or i3 or i5). You don’t need this in a expensive, irreparable platform.) Yes it look cool. I would say Microsoft Surface is better (CHEAPER?! seriously, apple.)
Solder-on HARDDRIVE? What the what.
Let’s face it. When your computer broke down (not the connector, not the keyboard, since most often it’s the motherboard), and you are stuck with two soldered on-board chips guarded by T2, I don’t know what you would like to do.
When any other computer broke down you can at least have a chance to visit your harddrive’s contents by pulling it out.
Connect the surface mount chip to another surface mount device to inspect it? Sure. But who will do that?
Да и вообще SSD на 128 Гб в 2019 году - это просто бред. Apple, WTF?
My MacBook Pro 2011 has 320 Gb!
Reminds me of the inside of an iphone, or ipad Looks as though Apple has applied the success of that technology to their laptop line. Thus making their laptop just another version of that design. It is inevitable that the iPad and Laptop will eventually morph into one as they are coming so close together in operational capability at this point. This appears to confirm that assumption Basically this 2019 macbook pro is nothing more than an iPad design, with external ports and a keyboard. I’m not at all surprised.
Paul Myres - 답글
About the comments concerning the SSD lifetime: I had a Mid-2012 Retina Macbook Pro bought 7 years ago, a few days after it came out. It had the first SSD in a MacBook Pro, the first Retina display and I maxed it out to 16GB RAM. I’ll have to admit that I had my doubts about the longevity of the SSD at the time.
Well that MacBook Pro got used heavily at least 10 hours a day for 7 years until finally the logic board died. I took out the SSD and I’m still using it inside an enclosure, attached via USB to my new Mac!
Surely the SSD technology has improved since 2012? But even if the tech hasn’t improved at all, I can tell you from experience that your MacBook SSD will most likely outlast the usable lifetime of the laptop (or other components).
Scott Lowe - 답글
Completely agree - there was a webpage about an SSD test where 250GB drives were continuously written until they failed. TLDR - every 250GB of SSD provide 25 years of heavy office use (based on actual heaviest office use among the place running an experiment). So a 1TB drive is good for a century of realistic heavy workload. Even with QLC that has 1/3 of an endurance these are ridiculously long life times that only concern Cloud servers and the like.
So this is the Touch Bar version? What about the non touch bar version, does it still have a replaceable SSD for this years model?
@gadgetuser The non-Touch Bar version has been reworked into what you see in this teardown—Apple reconfigured it and added a Touch Bar. In other words, all MacBook Pros now come with a Touch Bar. If you want a Touch Bar-less notebook computer new from Apple in 2019, the Retina MacBook Air is your only option.
In my opinion, every claim Apple makes about being environmentally responsible and their products being recyclable is nullified by their continued policy of intentionally engineered obsolescence. Hard soldering in RAM and SSD, and glueing in the battery serves no-one but Apple and since recycling is the least best option compared to repair or re-use, their hypocrisy is staggering. Sure, we like thin products but not that much. Why don’t they try launching a 2mm thicker variant of the MacBook Pro with user replaceable RAM, industry standard SSD and battery, and standard USB ports, then see which one users will end up buying. I for one would certainly prefer to know that my money is buying something that will still be working or repairable in 10 years time rather than the current time-bombs Apple is producing where the SSD and battery WILL fail as the technology is inherently degenerative.
“…as the technology is inherently degenerative.”
“…glueing in the battery serves no-one but Apple…”
“…recycling is the least best option compared to repair or re-use…”
When you make false statements like that, you can create all kinds of incorrect conclusions. Let me correct you.
SSD life and reliability is better than it has ever been. The same can be said of Li battery life.
Permanently attaching the battery lowers the cost (consumer benfit), prevents shifting (consumer benefit), and allows for more space and thus the maximum size battery / capacity (consumer benefit). It motivates the manufacturer to use batteries of the highest quality, since they know that every user who has to have their battery replaced prematurely results in a negative mark on the company, and potential loss of future sales (qualtiy battery = consumer benefit).
Every item you use goes into a landfill. Recycling puts it into a finite ‘recycling’ loop, but every product eventually leaves that loop and goes into the ground. Think about that.
This model just has one fan. The higher-end MacBook Pro models have two.
does this model feature a data recover port like earlier models with soldered-on SSD's?
For all those complaining about upgrades, remember that Macs are targeted towards users who don’t tinker with their systems. They just want something that works out of the box. To that end, the MacBook Pro does that. We use them for our creative department at work; I use them for my IT work. We have a ton of PC laptops too. We service the PC laptops all day. We never touch the Mac laptops, because they just work. We have super old MacBooks that are still serviceable with the OEM components.
Also remember that software is coded for specific hardware. Programmers are not going to create code that’s backward compatible forever, and eventually support gets dropped for older hardware. Typical consumers don’t need a computer that lasts forever. They need, and want, one that works with current applications and fits in with the current trends.
The previous year macbooks had a major issue where the display connector backlight pin (a high voltage pin) was next to a low voltage pin that goes directly to the CPU (potentially, and historically, frying CPU’s). Did they fix that in this model and stick a ground pin between the two?
What about the 4 thunderbolt version? Could you provide a tear down for that version because I know if is very different. There are two fans instead of the one in this one.
John Huynh - 답글
I don´t feel good at all about the fact that the SSD are soldered down on my MBP Touch Bar. People say that the SSD will outlast the computer anyway, but i mean surely an SSD can go bad at any point i guess? You have all kinds of health parameters like bad block count, retired block count, uncorrectable error count, etc. etc. I dont want to start to see the numbers on those parameters getting higher and higher on my soldered down SSD.
And on my MBP 2011 where i have installed an SATA SSD, i averaged about 30GB writes per day, only from computer processes, without me writing to the disk.
What are the solutions for a failed SSD which is soldered down, can it even be replaced by anybody else than Apple? Im thinking about the fact that the T1/T2 chip seems to be involved with the SSD?
And how much does Apple charge for the job of replacing an SSD?
But where 128gb ssd ????
