If you’ve ever had a product break without good repair options, the FTC wants to hear from you!
On November 14, 2023, iFixit and the Public Interest Research Group (PIRG) asked the US federal government to regulate Right to Repair. Specifically, we petitioned the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to initiate a rulemaking for Right to Repair laws.
Today, the FTC announced the opening of a comment submission period. This is the key next step, and the popularity determines whether the FTC will respond to our petition with a draft rule.
We need your help. If you’ve ever wanted to tell someone your mind, or really let loose about that thing that you wanted to fix and couldn’t, this is your moment. Tell the FTC your story! Short, long, witty, profane, it’s up to you. (Well, probably skip the #$*&# profanity.)

What’s in the Petition?
Our petition proposed a variety of ways the FTC could restore competition in repair markets around the country. We identified several ways that companies could make repair easier and more widely available:
- Accessibility of Consumable Components: Parts that routinely wear out, like batteries, should be replaceable and readily available for the product’s entire lifespan.
- Availability of Common Parts: Components prone to wear and tear should be easily replaceable.
- Freedom of Repair Choice: Consumers should have the liberty to choose their repair provider or opt for DIY solutions.
- Sustained Product Support: Even after a product is discontinued, its key functions should remain intact, with repairs possible through independent shops.
- Interchangeability of Identical Components: Components from identical devices should be interchangeable without needing manufacturer intervention.
- Protection of Consumer Privacy: Independent repair shops should not be mandated to disclose customers’ personal information to manufacturers.

We suggested that the FTC might initiate a repairability labeling rule, adding repair information to the yellow Energy Guide labels on energy-intensive products like TVs and washing machines. Or perhaps they might mandate a period of availability of repair parts, tools, or manuals.
Why the FTC?
The FTC has already been instrumental in advocating for Right to Repair. Their landmark 2021 report, “Nixing the Fix,” debunked manufacturers’ justifications for repair restrictions. They’ve taken action against companies like Harley-Davidson, Weber, and Westinghouse for voiding warranties for third-party repair work.
But in order to do more to support Right to Repair, they need a stronger rule to enforce.
Submit Your Comments
The opening of the FTC comment submission period is a critical moment. It’s your chance to share how the lack of repair access has impacted you. Whether it’s a story about a gadget you couldn’t fix or a repair denied by manufacturers, your experiences can influence the FTC’s decision-making process.
Visit the Federal eRulemaking Portal for docket number FTC-2023-0077 and follow the instructions to submit your comments. Be as creative as you want—but here’s some text you can copy-paste if you’re not feeling inspired:
The United States needs more Right to Repair rules. A lack of repair competition is hurting consumers and small repair businesses. Without national action to protect our repair rights, corporate repair monopolies will keep us wasting our own money, wasting our planet’s resources, and prematurely sending products to the dump. I support this petition and call on the FTC to take action!
The deadline is Friday, Feb 2 (30 days after the opening of the submission period).
A Collective Effort for a Repairable Future
Together, we can steer towards a future where repairability is a standard, not a privilege. Your comments and support can help shape policies that protect consumer rights and promote sustainability.
댓글 4개
I would go a step further and push for some sort of consumer protection law that requires companies turn over all relevant process details, bill of materials, assembly instructions, and source code if they cease supporting a discontinued product.
contact - 답글
It's the companies devices. No you shouldn't be able to force them to have replacement parts available. If they choose to do so then that is great, but no company should be forced to just make available what you want. It is their product and you know going into it what it is.
Kevin - 답글
It's about preventing companies from punishing people from repairing stuff that they bought from them. Right now, the companies have made it so that they're the only ones who can repair their products or provide parts for them meaning that when they stop providing support for their products, we have no other option but to buy the newer version of their product...
nnamdi nwoha -
I agree with this article. No doubt. If we purchase a product, it becomes ours. I already added a comment from a recent problem with our MacBook Pro. I want to go back to the days when repair was effortless. - But this could definitely help us!
Now, I also agree that we shouldn't "force" any companies to give us extra parts. If they choose not to give us anything, there's nothing we can do about it. That being said, I don't understand why some companies brag about how their products will last forever, if there is no way to get spare parts to make them last forever. There is a balance here.
But, we want control. And, we are willing to spend thousands of dollars on a computer that can't even be fixed, resold, or even reused. That seems like a waste to me. I truly believe this could be a huge step for the Repair Revolution.
Jadon Lyon - 답글